№11|2014

WASTEWATER SLUDGE TREATMENT

bbk 000000

UDC 628.336.57

KOZLOV M. N., Bogomolov M. V., Kevbrina M. V., Agaryov A. M.

The efficiency of enhancing wastewater sludge digestion

Summary

The results of experimental studies of enhancing wastewater sludge digestion as applied to the process flow scheme of the Kur’ianovskie Wastewater Treatment Facilities are presented. The specialists of the R&D Centre of «Mosvodokanal» JSC tested in the laboratory and calculated the economic efficiency of three options of digestion enhancement: sludge processing in the process of thermal hydrolysis before digestion; increasing the hydraulic retention time; increasing the solids retention time. The studies were aiming at comparing the efficiency of sludge digestion when using the given technology solutions. Increasing the hydraulic retention time (HRT) is caused by sludge thickening enhancement before digesters. The experience of the Prague wastewater treatment facilities shows that thickening enhancement alone provides for efficiency improving by a few percent. This was confirmed in the process of laboratory experiments in the R&D Centre. Sludge pretreatment before digestion with the purpose of accelerating the hydrolysis of stable organic matter, e. g. thermal hydrolysis, ensures significant enhancement of the entire process by activating the slowest stage of hydrolysis; as a result, the decomposition of ash-free matter and biogas output were increased by 10–30%. However, this type of technology involves high capital expenditures. Increasing the solids retention time (SRT) is achieved by retaining solids in the digester while maintaining the hydraulic retention time (HRT). This can be ensured by retaining or recycling solids to the digester. The technology of sludge recycling serves as an example that provides for the high organic matter decomposition by means of increasing the solids retention time without any significant capital investments. Thus, following the results of the studies the given technology has been accepted as a most cost-effective.

Key words

, , , ,

The further text is accessible on a paid subscription.
For authorisation enter the login/password.
Or subscribe

REFERENCES

  1. Owen W. F., Stuckey D. C., Healy Jr., Young L. Y., McCarty P. L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research, 1979, v. 13, pp. 485–492.
  2. Spravochnik po prikladnoi statistike [The directory on the applied statistics. In 2 volumes: Translated from English. Under the editorship of E. Lloyd, U. Lederman, S. A. Aivazian, Iu. N. Tiurin. Moscow, Financy i Statistika Publ., 1990, 526 p.].
  3. Khramenkov S. V., Pakhomov A. N., Strel’tsov S. A., Kevbrina M. V., Vaniushina A. Ia., Agarev A. M. [Improving the efficiency of wastewater sludge pretreatment by high temperature hydrolysis before digestion]. Vodosnabzhenie i Sanitarnaia Tekhnika, 2012, no. 10, pp. 55–60. (In Russian).

vstmag engfree 200x100 2

mvkniipr ru

Российская ассоциация водоснабжения и водоотведения

Конференция итог

ecw20 200 300

VAK2